QUALITY IN OUR SOCIETY – PART 2

 

Highlight Quality
Always make quality the highlight

In our last edition we began a discussion on the critical importance of quality going back to as far as the ancient Greek society. We pointed out that often today buying decisions are based on a lack of proper knowledge and training.

Hence the old Bell System had intensive training programs and detailed specifications that resulted in a highly reliable telephone system. However today the knowledge level of many engineers, technicians and management in our industry is seriously insufficient.

Therefore isn’t it ironic that customers outside of the USA always seem to value American made products for their quality? As a result they often seek out these American made products in their purchasing efforts. Yet, unlike our foreign counterparts, far too many consumers in the U.S. look for the lowest cost versus seeking the value found in high quality.

Quality under the magnifying glass
Quality should be given a closer look

What are the attributes of Quality?

  1. Performance
    > Products or deployed networks should meet the specifications
  2. Reliability
    > High product failure rates result in significant downtime and operational costs.
  3. Durability
    > Will the product hold up in the environment which it is used
  4. Serviceability
    > Reputable firms have warranties

Why is Quality Important?

  1. Productivity
    > Poor Quality results in breakdowns, network inefficiency or even work stoppages
  2. Profitability
    > Quality increases profitability
  3. Reputation / Customer Loyalty / Customer Expectation & Satisfaction
    > If poor choices are made it will affect your personal reputation
    > Poor choices can result in poor products and/or services leaving your company reputation damaged and losing customer loyalty
  4. Meeting Standards
    > Do the products meet safety and defined industry standards
  5. Costs
    > Poor Quality increases costs particularly over the long-term
value vs price
Value outweighs price

Furthermore the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recently conducted a report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education entitled “Time for the U.S. to Reskill?.” The organization discovered that a whopping 36 million adults in the U.S. are considered low skilled workers; lacking basic skills in literacy, numeracy and problem-solving. While these are considered the minimal skills necessary for meaningful employment in a high-tech global economy the reality is that in wired or wireless networking careers the true skill level needed is much, much higher.

Yet how to solve this  problem and close this gap is debatable. First of all, at the very minimum the corporate world employing technical workers should offer internal seminars, courses or pay for outside training courses while creating mandated levels of skilled knowledge for their employees. In addition, bonuses or merit pay increases should be tied to those employees motivated to increase their knowledge level and whom make an attempt to provide excellence in Quality.

Quality or Cost?
Which Do you Want?

Look for future articles detailing specific examples related to the IT networking industry.

Click Here To READ “QUALITY IN OUR SOCIETY – PART 1”

AN UPDATE TO THE ENCROACHMENT ON THE UNLICENSED 5 GHz BAND

LTE to 5GHz encroachment In April we discussed the encroachment on the unlicensed 5 GHz band, more specifically that Qualcomm has been pushing for using for sharing the 5.1 to 5.8 GHz channels for LTE-U (U=unlicensed). There has certainly been much debate about sharing this spectrum which is commonly used by WiFi, including the most recent 802.11ac standard being used in newer products. The debate has only intensified recently, with big players stepping up one both sides to make their arguments heard on the issue.

Major carriers such as Verizon, T-Mobile and others paid huge amounts of money for their ability to use this spectrum. Thus, for those companies the encroachment on the 5 GHz band, the same band that they depend on for WiFi deployments without even incurring a cost, doesn’t sit well. The WiFi Alliance, along with others, have stated their concern about possible interference and future problems among current WiFi networks. The counter argument by Qualcomm and supporters of the use of LTE-U is that it won’t result in any more interference than the creation of a new WiFi access point would now.

Both sides remain steadfast and the debate does not appear to have a clear answer in sight. The WiFi Alliance is reporting that by September they will have a test plan to in place for examining the exact result of this use of LTE-U; Qualcomm is demanding immediate testing. Hopefully, the results of these tests will ease the debate a some and provide us with some clarity.

The result of this debate could have some major effects on the entire mobile industry. It is without a doubt something very important to keep an eye on for everyone in the industry.  Those concerned about the potential effects can provide their comments to directly to the FCC or to your residing state congressmen.

 

 

qualcomm exhibit

 

Check out our full look at The 3.5 GHz Spectrum here